GANGAMMA vs ANUSUYA — 72/2024
Case under Under Order 41 Rule 1 R/w Sec.96 of Cpc. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KABR010026332024
Filing Number
73/2024
Filing Date
21-Jun-2024
Registration No
72/2024
Registration Date
22-Jun-2024
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL
Judge
538-II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GANGAMMA
Adv. NAVYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANUSUYA
-
2.VEENAMMA ALIAS VEENA
-
3.K M NIJALINGAPP SINCE DEAD BY HIS LEGAL HERIS 3A. YASHODAMMA
-
4.3B. CHAYA M
-
5.4. M KUMAR SINCE DEAD BY LRS 4A. ASHWINI G
-
6.4B. SAANVIKA
-
7.5. M GIRISH
-
8.6 MURALIDHAR H M
-
9.7 D H VENKATESH
Case History
-
29-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Hearing
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Objection
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Objection
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
27-Oct-2025
Objection
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Objection
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Evidence
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Objection
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
Case 72/2024 Summary On 28.03.2025, a witness was examined and sworn in. The court recorded the witness's testimony in detail. The opposing counsel requested an adjournment as the senior counsel could not attend court that day. The witness works as a CMO at Victoria Hospital and sufficient time had already been granted. The court rejected the adjournment request and proceeded with the examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
21-Mar-2025
Evidence
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
28-Feb-2025
Evidnce
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2025
Evidnce
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
05-Dec-2024
Objection
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
16-Nov-2024
Objection
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Objection
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
24-Aug-2024
Objection
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Objection
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2024
Objection
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
11-Jul-2024
Notice
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
22-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 72/2024
Case 72/2024 Summary On 28.03.2025, a witness was examined and sworn in. The court recorded the witness's testimony in detail. The opposing counsel requested an adjournment as the senior counsel could not attend court that day. The witness works as a CMO at Victoria Hospital and sufficient time had already been granted. The court rejected the adjournment request and proceeded with the examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts