BYADARAHALLI POLICE STATION vs A1. VASU K ALIAS ANDRAHALLI VASU — 130/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/S,399,402. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSION CASES

CNR: KABR010025922025

Filing Number

130/2025

Filing Date

27-Jun-2025

Registration No

130/2025

Registration Date

27-Jun-2025

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL

Judge

536-Prl.district And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

BYADARAHALLI PS

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section U/S,399,402
Arms Act Section U/S,25(1B)(B),R/W,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BYADARAHALLI POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A1. VASU K ALIAS ANDRAHALLI VASU

  2. 2.A2. VIKAS S

  3. 3.A3. CHANDRASHEKAR ALIAS CHANDU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    313 StatementView PDF

    Summary of Case 130/2025 Case: Byadarahalli Police Station v. Vasu K (A1), Vikas S (A2), Chandrashekar (A3), Mahesh S (A4), and Lokesh (A5) Date: 3 June 2026 Summary: This is a criminal case involving armed robbery charges against five accused. On 15 January 2021, police conducted a CCB operation in Byadarahalli area and apprehended four of the five accused, recovering weapons (lathis/bamboo sticks) and powder from them. The fifth accused, Lokesh, escaped. The court examined the accused under CrPC Section 313, asking them to respond to witness testimonies about the recovery of weapons and their roles in attempting to rob the public. The accused were given the opportunity to present their defense and cross-examine prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  5. 27-May-2026

    Accused Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  6. 22-May-2026

    Accused Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  7. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  8. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    ChargeView PDF

  12. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  13. 13-Feb-2026

    Hbc

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  14. 30-Jan-2026

    Hbc

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  15. 12-Jan-2026

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  16. 31-Dec-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  17. 22-Dec-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  18. 20-Nov-2025

    Body Warrant

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  19. 31-Oct-2025

    Hbc

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  20. 17-Oct-2025

    NBW Proclamation and attachment

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  21. 09-Oct-2025

    NBW Proclamation and attachment

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  22. 19-Aug-2025

    NBW Proclamation and attachment

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  23. 07-Jul-2025

    NBW Proclamation and attachment

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  24. 27-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 27-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 130/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 130/2025 Case: Byadarahalli Police Station v. Vasu K (A1), Vikas S (A2), Chandrashekar (A3), Mahesh S (A4), and Lokesh (A5) Date: 3 June 2026 Summary: This is a criminal case involving armed robbery charges against five accused. On 15 January 2021, police conducted a CCB operation in Byadarahalli area and apprehended four of the five accused, recovering weapons (lathis/bamboo sticks) and powder from them. The fifth accused, Lokesh, escaped. The court examined the accused under CrPC Section 313, asking them to respond to witness testimonies about the recovery of weapons and their roles in attempting to rob the public. The accused were given the opportunity to present their defense and cross-examine prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case