RAUSHAN KUMAR YADAV vs VARTHUR POLICE STATION — 1051/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 01st July 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC PETITION

CNR: KABR010025102026

Filing Number

1060/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

1051/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL

Judge

536-Prl.district And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0114

Police Station

VARTHUR PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAUSHAN KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. L RAJESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VARTHUR POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jul-2026

    Orders

    The criminal miscellaneous petition filed by Raushan Kumar Yadav against Varthur Police Station was closed and disposed on July 1, 2026, by the District and Sessions Judge. The court found no grounds for the petition and no representation was made; despite sufficient opportunity being provided, the petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  4. 23-Jun-2026

    To hear

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    To hear

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  6. 09-Jun-2026

    Objection

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  7. 02-Jun-2026

    Objection

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  8. 26-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1051/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The criminal miscellaneous petition filed by Raushan Kumar Yadav against Varthur Police Station was closed and disposed on July 1, 2026, by the District and Sessions Judge. The court found no grounds for the petition and no representation was made; despite sufficient opportunity being provided, the petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case