HIRAKJYOTHI BORA vs ELECTRONIC CITY POLICE STATION — 505/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 26th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC PETITION
CNR: KABR010012812026
Filing Number
496/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
505/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL
Judge
536-Prl.district And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0091
Police Station
ELECTRONIC CITY PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HIRAKJYOTHI BORA
Adv. RAJESH S
Respondent(s)
-
1.ELECTRONIC CITY POLICE STATION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Orders
Summary of Case 505/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, granted anticipatory bail to Hirakjyoti Bora in a case involving alleged cheating and IT Act violations (Crime No.91/2025). Though Bora's name was not mentioned in the original FIR, bank records showed ₹2 lakh was transferred to his Bandhan Bank account from victim funds, establishing prima-facie involvement in an investment fraud scheme where the complainant lost ₹36,87,314. The court found Bora's apprehension of arrest genuine despite weak procedural linkage, and granted bail with conditions including ₹50,000 personal bond, non-tampering with witnesses, and regular appearance before investigating officers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl.district And Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Order
Prl.district And Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
Prl.district And Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 505/2026
Summary of Case 505/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, granted anticipatory bail to Hirakjyoti Bora in a case involving alleged cheating and IT Act violations (Crime No.91/2025). Though Bora's name was not mentioned in the original FIR, bank records showed ₹2 lakh was transferred to his Bandhan Bank account from victim funds, establishing prima-facie involvement in an investment fraud scheme where the complainant lost ₹36,87,314. The court found Bora's apprehension of arrest genuine despite weak procedural linkage, and granted bail with conditions including ₹50,000 personal bond, non-tampering with witnesses, and regular appearance before investigating officers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts