GIRSHA M K vs RAJANUKUNTE POLICE STATION — 479/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 25th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC PETITION
CNR: KABR010012562026
Filing Number
486/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
479/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL
Judge
538-II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0049
Police Station
RAJANUKUNTE PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GIRSHA M K
Adv. M S NAGAMANI
-
2.PRATHIBHA R
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJANUKUNTE POLICE STATION
-
2.SANTHANARAJ
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 479/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Girsha M K and Prathibha R in a construction dispute case involving alleged caste humiliation and cheating. The judge found no prima facie case under the SC/ST Atrocities Act because the complaint failed to establish that caste humiliation occurred in public view, and the underlying dispute was primarily financial. The court imposed conditions including Rs 50,000 personal bonds, biweekly police attendance, cooperation with investigation, and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Order
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Objection
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Objection
II Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 479/2026
Case 479/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Girsha M K and Prathibha R in a construction dispute case involving alleged caste humiliation and cheating. The judge found no prima facie case under the SC/ST Atrocities Act because the complaint failed to establish that caste humiliation occurred in public view, and the underlying dispute was primarily financial. The court imposed conditions including Rs 50,000 personal bonds, biweekly police attendance, cooperation with investigation, and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts