RAJA vs BYADARAHALLI POLICE STATION — 446/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(1)(b). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC PETITION
CNR: KABR010011912026
Filing Number
455/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
446/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL
Judge
1014-VI Addl.district And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
537
Police Station
BYADARAHALLI PS
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJA
Adv. R PRASANA RAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.BYADARAHALLI POLICE STATION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: Raja v. Byadarahalli Police Station (Crl.Misc.No.446/2026) The court rejected Raja's petition to modify bail conditions imposed in February 2025 for offences under IPC sections 341, 364A, 120B, and 506. The court found that despite one year having elapsed, Raja had not complied with any bail conditions—including failing to deposit the required Rs. 25,000 cash security—and only sought extension after an unreasonable delay, demonstrating gross negligence and disobedience toward court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
VI Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
VI Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
VI Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
To hear on B/A
VI Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
To hear on B/A
VI Addl.district And Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 446/2026
Case Summary: Raja v. Byadarahalli Police Station (Crl.Misc.No.446/2026) The court rejected Raja's petition to modify bail conditions imposed in February 2025 for offences under IPC sections 341, 364A, 120B, and 506. The court found that despite one year having elapsed, Raja had not complied with any bail conditions—including failing to deposit the required Rs. 25,000 cash security—and only sought extension after an unreasonable delay, demonstrating gross negligence and disobedience toward court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts