BHARATH S vs KAGGALIPURA POLICE STATION — 516/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 26th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC PETITION
CNR: KABR010011522026
Filing Number
430/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
516/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL
Judge
536-Prl.district And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
358
Police Station
KAGGALIPURA PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHARATH S
Adv. R PRAVEEN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAGGALIPURA POLICE STATION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Orders
Case Summary: 516/2026 The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Bharath S. for alleged non-bailable offences (assaulting a woman police constable, obstructing public roads, and related charges under BNS 2023). The court found the petitioner's specific role unspecified in the FIR, noted other accused already received bail, and determined conditions could safeguard against witness tampering and absconding. Bail was granted with ₹75,000 personal bond, surety requirements, and conditions including non-interference with witnesses and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl.district And Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Order
Prl.district And Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
Prl.district And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 516/2026
Case Summary: 516/2026 The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Bharath S. for alleged non-bailable offences (assaulting a woman police constable, obstructing public roads, and related charges under BNS 2023). The court found the petitioner's specific role unspecified in the FIR, noted other accused already received bail, and determined conditions could safeguard against witness tampering and absconding. Bail was granted with ₹75,000 personal bond, surety requirements, and conditions including non-interference with witnesses and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts