NELAMANGALA TOWN POLICE STATION vs A1. LAKSHMAN KUMAR — 46/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/S,103(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 06-Jul-2026 this date has passed

SC - SESSION CASES

CNR: KABR010007512025

Filing Number

46/2025

Filing Date

24-Feb-2025

Registration No

46/2025

Registration Date

24-Feb-2025

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL

Judge

536-Prl.district And Sessions Judge

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

250

Police Station

NELAMANGALA TOWN PS

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/S,103(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NELAMANGALA TOWN POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A1. LAKSHMAN KUMAR

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Fdt

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  4. 20-May-2026

    Fdt

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Fdt

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  10. 29-Dec-2025

    Fdt

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  11. 25-Nov-2025

    Fdt

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  12. 28-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Case Summary: SC No. 46/2025 Outcome: Bail application dismissed. Lakshman Kumar, accused of murdering samosa factory manager Hemaraj Rana on November 3, 2024, sought bail after being in judicial custody since arrest. The court found a prima-facie case established by charge sheet evidence showing the accused committed murder with premeditation following prior quarrels. The judge dismissed the petition, citing the serious nature of the offense (BNS Section 103(1) – murder, punishable by death/life imprisonment), risk of absconding, and potential witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 28-Oct-2025

    Fdt

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  14. 14-Oct-2025

    Order

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  15. 08-Oct-2025

    Objection

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  16. 30-Sep-2025

    Objection

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  17. 22-Sep-2025

    Fdt

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  18. 20-Aug-2025

    Fdt

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  19. 23-Jul-2025

    Charge

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  20. 30-Jun-2025

    Call On

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  21. 05-Jun-2025

    Production Of Accused

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  22. 22-May-2025

    Production Of Accused

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  23. 08-May-2025

    Production Of Accused

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  24. 23-Apr-2025

    Production Of Accused

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  25. 09-Apr-2025

    Production Of Accused

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  26. 26-Mar-2025

    Production Of Accused

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  27. 12-Mar-2025

    Production Of Accused

    IX Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  28. 25-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 24-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 46/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SC No. 46/2025 Outcome: Bail application dismissed. Lakshman Kumar, accused of murdering samosa factory manager Hemaraj Rana on November 3, 2024, sought bail after being in judicial custody since arrest. The court found a prima-facie case established by charge sheet evidence showing the accused committed murder with premeditation following prior quarrels. The judge dismissed the petition, citing the serious nature of the offense (BNS Section 103(1) – murder, punishable by death/life imprisonment), risk of absconding, and potential witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case