NANDAGUDI POLICE STATION vs A1. RIYAZ BAIG — 10/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/S,143,148,307,324,R/W,149. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

SC - SESSION CASES

CNR: KABR010002262025

Filing Number

10/2025

Filing Date

21-Jan-2025

Registration No

10/2025

Registration Date

21-Jan-2025

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL

Judge

536-Prl.district And Sessions Judge

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

NANDAGUDI PS

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section U/S,143,148,307,324,R/W,149

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NANDAGUDI POLICE STATION

    Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A1. RIYAZ BAIG

  2. 2.A2. AJU BAIG

  3. 3.A3. SYED JAMEER AHMAD

  4. 4.A4. SAJJAD ALI BAIG

  5. 5.A5. MUJAMIL BAIG

  6. 6.A6. KALIM BAIG

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  3. 21-May-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: SC No. 10/2025 Court: Principal District and Sessions Court, Bengaluru Rural District Outcome: Case adjourned with cost of Rs. 500/-. The accused's counsel requested time for cross-examination. Witness examination proceeded; physical evidence (shirt, pants, undergarment) was identified and marked as exhibits (M.A. 1-3). Accused No. 1 appeared via video conference. Cross-examination requests by accused counsels were rejected for lack of valid reasons. Case set for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  11. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  12. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  13. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  14. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  15. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  16. 26-Nov-2025

    Fdt

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  17. 30-Oct-2025

    Charge

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  18. 15-Sep-2025

    Charge

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  19. 11-Aug-2025

    Charge

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  20. 21-Jul-2025

    Charge

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  21. 23-Jun-2025

    Charge

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  22. 23-Apr-2025

    Charge

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  23. 25-Mar-2025

    Hbc

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  24. 21-Mar-2025

    Hbc

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  25. 28-Feb-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  26. 21-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 21-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SC No. 10/2025 Court: Principal District and Sessions Court, Bengaluru Rural District Outcome: Case adjourned with cost of Rs. 500/-. The accused's counsel requested time for cross-examination. Witness examination proceeded; physical evidence (shirt, pants, undergarment) was identified and marked as exhibits (M.A. 1-3). Accused No. 1 appeared via video conference. Cross-examination requests by accused counsels were rejected for lack of valid reasons. Case set for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case