Ramagouda S/o. Babagouda Patil vs The Assistant Commissioner and LAO Jamkhandi — 5693/2021
Case under U/sec 64(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in L.a.r.r. Act 2013. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases
CNR: KABK730062112021
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
5693/2021
Filing Date
28-10-2021
Registration No
5693/2021
Registration Date
29-10-2021
Court
I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE COURT BAGALKOT SITTING AT JAMKHANDI
Judge
1171-I Addl. D and S Judge Bagalkot sitting Jamkhandi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramagouda S/o. Babagouda Patil
Adv. B.V.PATIL
Respondent(s)
The Assistant Commissioner and LAO Jamkhandi
The Executive Engineer Minior Irrigation Dept. Division-Vijaypur.
The State of Karnataka, R/by Deputy Commissioner, Bagalkot.
Hearing History
Judge: 1171-I Addl. D and S Judge Bagalkot sitting Jamkhandi
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This is a Land Acquisition Commission (LAC) order from Bagalkot, Karnataka concerning land acquisition cases (LAC No.5693/2021 and connected cases). The court examined the petitioner's testimony regarding compensation for acquired agricultural land in Janawad village and rejected multiple claims made by the petitioner, including claims about crop yields, income calculations, and the authenticity of purchase documents submitted as evidence. The court found the petitioner's statements to be largely false and ruled against his contentions regarding proper compensation determination. No further review/reconsideration was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This is a Land Acquisition Commission (LAC) order from Bagalkot, Karnataka concerning land acquisition cases (LAC No.5693/2021 and connected cases). The court examined the petitioner's testimony regarding compensation for acquired agricultural land in Janawad village and rejected multiple claims made by the petitioner, including claims about crop yields, income calculations, and the authenticity of purchase documents submitted as evidence. The court found the petitioner's statements to be largely false and ruled against his contentions regarding proper compensation determination. No further review/reconsideration was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
More from this court
I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE COURT BAGALKOT SITTING AT JAMKHANDI All courts →Explore other courts