Balachandra S/o Kadappa Ngoni vs The State of Karnataka, R/by Deputy Commissioner, Bagalkot. — 5687/2021
Case under U/sec 64(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in L.a.r.r. Act 2013. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases
CNR: KABK730062032021
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
5687/2021
Filing Date
28-10-2021
Registration No
5687/2021
Registration Date
28-10-2021
Court
I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE COURT BAGALKOT SITTING AT JAMKHANDI
Judge
1171-I Addl. D and S Judge Bagalkot sitting Jamkhandi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balachandra S/o Kadappa Ngoni
Adv. S.R.Soraganvi
Surekha Subhas Jamakhandi
Sunanda Channappa Siddannavar
Muttavva Ramesh Ganiger
Suresh Rayappa Nagoni
Kallappa Rayapa Nagoni
Satyavva Shekareppa Nagoni
Laxmibai Ningappa Gavaroji
Gurusiddappa Shekareppa Nagoni
Geeta Kalagouda Patil
Respondent(s)
The State of Karnataka, R/by Deputy Commissioner, Bagalkot.
The Special Land Acquisition officer and A.C. Jamkhandi
Hearing History
Judge: 1171-I Addl. D and S Judge Bagalkot sitting Jamkhandi
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 27-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 07-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 29-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 17-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a land acquisition case (LAC No. 5687/2021) heard in the Additional District Court at Bagalkot. The court rejected the petitioner's objections to the land acquisition compensation, finding that the petitioner made false claims regarding the market value of the land, alleged crops grown, and income generation. The court upheld the compensation award and dismissed the petition, noting no grounds for reconsideration and affirming the land acquisition authority's valuation as proper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a land acquisition case (LAC No. 5687/2021) heard in the Additional District Court at Bagalkot. The court rejected the petitioner's objections to the land acquisition compensation, finding that the petitioner made false claims regarding the market value of the land, alleged crops grown, and income generation. The court upheld the compensation award and dismissed the petition, noting no grounds for reconsideration and affirming the land acquisition authority's valuation as proper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
More from this court
I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE COURT BAGALKOT SITTING AT JAMKHANDI All courts →Explore other courts