Mahesh Mahalingappa Chichakandi vs The Assistant Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Jamkhandi — 5145/2022
Case under U/sec 64(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in L.a.r.r. Act 2013. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases
CNR: KABK730009682022
Next Hearing
28th March 2026
Filing Number
5145/2022
Filing Date
09-11-2022
Registration No
5145/2022
Registration Date
09-11-2022
Court
I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE COURT BAGALKOT SITTING AT JAMKHANDI
Judge
1171-I Addl. D and S Judge Bagalkot sitting Jamkhandi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahesh Mahalingappa Chichakandi
Adv. C.R.Sutar
Respondent(s)
The Assistant Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Jamkhandi
The State of Karnataka, R/by Deputy Commissioner, Bagalkot.
Hearing History
Judge: 1171-I Addl. D and S Judge Bagalkot sitting Jamkhandi
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Land Acquisition Case (LAC No.5145/2022) involving testimony of Witness 1 (P.W.1) regarding land acquisition for a railway project. The witness testified on 27.02.2026 and raised multiple objections to the land acquisition proceedings, challenging the valuation methodology, lack of proper notice, inadequate compensation calculations, and alleged false claims about crop yields and land productivity. The court recorded the witness's statement noting his allegations that government authorities failed to follow proper procedures and that false documents were created to support compensation claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Land Acquisition Case (LAC No.5145/2022) involving testimony of Witness 1 (P.W.1) regarding land acquisition for a railway project. The witness testified on 27.02.2026 and raised multiple objections to the land acquisition proceedings, challenging the valuation methodology, lack of proper notice, inadequate compensation calculations, and alleged false claims about crop yields and land productivity. The court recorded the witness's statement noting his allegations that government authorities failed to follow proper procedures and that false documents were created to support compensation claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
More from this court
I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE COURT BAGALKOT SITTING AT JAMKHANDI All courts →Explore other courts