Mohmadyunus Abdulkhadar Parthanalli vs Riyaz Abudurehaman Parthanalli Advocate - D.M.JATTI, — 200/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Status: FURTHER EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK710038172021
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
198/2021
Filing Date
06-12-2021
Registration No
200/2021
Registration Date
08-12-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohmadyunus Abdulkhadar Parthanalli
Adv. P. P. NANDAGAON
Almas Ahmaed Abdulkhadar Parthanahalli
Respondent(s)
Riyaz Abudurehaman Parthanalli Advocate - D.M.JATTI,
Mehemud Abudurehaman Parthanalli
The State represented by Deputy Commissioner
Adv. A.G.P
The Assistant Director of Land Records
Hearing History
Judge: 871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
FURTHER EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | FURTHER EVIDENCE |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this property dispute case (O.S. No. 200/2021) heard on 06.03.2026, the court examined evidence regarding boundary disputes between adjoining properties (Survey No. 104 and 104/4). The court admitted photographic evidence (Exhibits Nidi-1 and Nidi-2) under Indian Evidence Act Section 63(4) after examining witness testimony about boundary markers, fencing, and property demarcation. The case was adjourned with directions for both parties to undergo joint site inspection and cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this property dispute case (O.S. No. 200/2021) heard on 06.03.2026, the court examined evidence regarding boundary disputes between adjoining properties (Survey No. 104 and 104/4). The court admitted photographic evidence (Exhibits Nidi-1 and Nidi-2) under Indian Evidence Act Section 63(4) after examining witness testimony about boundary markers, fencing, and property demarcation. The case was adjourned with directions for both parties to undergo joint site inspection and cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts