Amasidda S/o Sidaraya Lonar @ Lonari vs Adiveppa S/o Bandu Lonari @ Lonar Advocate - G.I.H — 228/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Status: JUDGMENT. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK710025452022
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
228/2022
Filing Date
18-11-2022
Registration No
228/2022
Registration Date
18-11-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amasidda S/o Sidaraya Lonar @ Lonari
Adv. T.P.BANGI
Respondent(s)
Adiveppa S/o Bandu Lonari @ Lonar Advocate - G.I.H
Lakkawwa W/o Adiveppa Lonari @ Lonar
Parashuram S/o Adiveppa Lonari @ Lonar
Hearing History
Judge: 871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
JUDGMENT
ARGUMENTS OF DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
ARGUMENTS OF DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
ARGUMENTS OF DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGMENT |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS OF DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT |
| 03-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS OF DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT |
| 28-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS OF DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT |
| 23-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary In a civil suit (O.S. No. 228/2022) for specific performance of an agreement to sell, the Additional Civil Judge & JMFC at Jamkhandi allowed three interim applications (IA No. 7, 8, and 9) filed by the plaintiff. The court permitted the plaintiff to reopen his evidence stage, recalled witness PW-1, and allowed production of newly discovered documents (notice copies, mutation entries, and records of rights) that were deemed material and relevant to the case. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 200/- on the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In a civil suit (O.S. No. 228/2022) for specific performance of an agreement to sell, the Additional Civil Judge & JMFC at Jamkhandi allowed three interim applications (IA No. 7, 8, and 9) filed by the plaintiff. The court permitted the plaintiff to reopen his evidence stage, recalled witness PW-1, and allowed production of newly discovered documents (notice copies, mutation entries, and records of rights) that were deemed material and relevant to the case. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 200/- on the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts