Shakuntala Ravsab Khota vs Manegeni Bhimappa Guggari — 108/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Status: CROSS OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK710017702022
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
108/2022
Filing Date
30-06-2022
Registration No
108/2022
Registration Date
01-07-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shakuntala Ravsab Khota
Adv. B. I. Dhangi
Respondent(s)
Manegeni Bhimappa Guggari
Laxmibayi @ Laxmi Manigeni Guggari
Dhareppa Manigeni Guggari
Adv. P. P. NANDAGAON
Idravva Annasab Khota
Hearing History
Judge: 871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
CROSS OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
CROSS OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
CROSS OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
CROSS OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | CROSS OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT |
| 11-03-2026 | CROSS OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT |
| 06-03-2026 | CROSS OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT |
| 28-02-2026 | CROSS OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary In Civil Case No. 108/2022, heard on 19.03.2025, the court examined witness testimony regarding a property dispute. The court found that the third defendant unlawfully obtained possession of the disputed properties and falsely registered them in his name, despite the plaintiff's lack of possession. The court also noted contradictions in the plaintiff's testimony and evidence, determining that the plaintiff has not established a valid legal claim to the properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Civil Case No. 108/2022, heard on 19.03.2025, the court examined witness testimony regarding a property dispute. The court found that the third defendant unlawfully obtained possession of the disputed properties and falsely registered them in his name, despite the plaintiff's lack of possession. The court also noted contradictions in the plaintiff's testimony and evidence, determining that the plaintiff has not established a valid legal claim to the properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts