Laxman S/o Goudappa Patil ( Adopted) Alias Hunashikatti, vs The Deputy Commissioner — 222/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VIIRule1. Status: FURTHER EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK710016702023
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
221/2023
Filing Date
24-08-2023
Registration No
222/2023
Registration Date
30-08-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxman S/o Goudappa Patil ( Adopted) Alias Hunashikatti,
Adv. A. B. Kadapatti
Respondent(s)
The Deputy Commissioner
The Secretary, Town Development Board
The Chief Officer, City Municipal Council
The Assistant Coimmissioner, A.C. Office
The Tahasildar,
The Assistant Director of Land record
The Deputy Director of Land Records,
Bhimashi Biradar
Hearing History
Judge: 871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
FURTHER EVIDENCE
FURTHER EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | FURTHER EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | FURTHER EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 222/2023 | Court: Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Jamkhandi | Date: 27 April 2024 Outcome: Temporary injunction application ALLOWED. The court restrained defendants from effecting any work on the suit property (which plaintiff claims to own and valued at ₹90 lakhs) till further orders, finding the plaintiff established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favors him, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 222/2023 | Court: Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Jamkhandi | Date: 27 April 2024 Outcome: Temporary injunction application ALLOWED. The court restrained defendants from effecting any work on the suit property (which plaintiff claims to own and valued at ₹90 lakhs) till further orders, finding the plaintiff established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favors him, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts