Sharada W/o Suresh Biradar vs The Deputy Commissioner — 220/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VIIRule1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK710016682023
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
219/2023
Filing Date
24-08-2023
Registration No
220/2023
Registration Date
30-08-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sharada W/o Suresh Biradar
Adv. A. B. Kadapatti
Respondent(s)
The Deputy Commissioner
The Secretary, Town Development Board
The Chief Officer , the City Municipal Council
The Assistant Commissioner, A.C. Office
The Tahasildar
The Assistant Director of Land Record
The Deputy Director of Land Records
Bhimashi Biradar
Hearing History
Judge: 871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
EVIDENCE
ORDER
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 220/2023 | Smt. Sharada W/o Suresh Biradar vs. Deputy Commissioner & Others Court: Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Jamkhandi Date: 27th April 2024 Outcome: Temporary injunction application GRANTED. The court restrained defendants from effecting any work on the suit property (bearing R.S. No. 630/K in Jamkhandi) until further orders. The plaintiff, who invested ₹90 lakhs in constructing a house on the property, successfully demonstrated a prima facie case, balance of convenience in her favor, and risk of irreparable loss if demolition proceeds without full trial resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 220/2023 | Smt. Sharada W/o Suresh Biradar vs. Deputy Commissioner & Others Court: Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Jamkhandi Date: 27th April 2024 Outcome: Temporary injunction application GRANTED. The court restrained defendants from effecting any work on the suit property (bearing R.S. No. 630/K in Jamkhandi) until further orders. The plaintiff, who invested ₹90 lakhs in constructing a house on the property, successfully demonstrated a prima facie case, balance of convenience in her favor, and risk of irreparable loss if demolition proceeds without full trial resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts