Bharati Hanamant Sutar vs Adappa Bhimappa Sutar — 106/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/oVIIRULE1AND3. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK710009872025
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
15-05-2025
Filing Number
115/2025
Filing Date
09-06-2025
Registration No
106/2025
Registration Date
09-06-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bharati Hanamant Sutar
Adv. M V Bidarikar
Jyoti Prakash Pattar
Adv. M V Bidarikar
Respondent(s)
Adappa Bhimappa Sutar
Hearing History
Judge: 871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
ORDER
Restored
EVIDENCE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 17-03-2026 | Restored |
| 17-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for a temporary injunction seeking to restrain the defendant from interfering with their peaceful possession of the disputed property (Plot No. B-319). The judge found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, demonstrate hardship, or show that the balance of convenience favored them. The court noted that a status quo order had already been issued in a related partition suit (O.S. No. 42/2025) by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, making the present application unnecessary and preventing the grant of injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for a temporary injunction seeking to restrain the defendant from interfering with their peaceful possession of the disputed property (Plot No. B-319). The judge found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, demonstrate hardship, or show that the balance of convenience favored them. The court noted that a status quo order had already been issued in a related partition suit (O.S. No. 42/2025) by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, making the present application unnecessary and preventing the grant of injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts