Bharati Hanamant Sutar vs Adappa Bhimappa Sutar — 106/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/oVIIRULE1AND3. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK710009872025
e-Filing Number
15-05-2025
Filing Number
115/2025
Filing Date
09-Jun-2025
Registration No
106/2025
Registration Date
09-Jun-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
871-Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bharati Hanamant Sutar
Adv. M V Bidarikar
-
2.Jyoti Prakash Pattar
Adv. M V Bidarikar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Adappa Bhimappa Sutar
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
17-Mar-2026
Restored
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
24-Feb-2026
Arguments
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
05-Feb-2026
Hearing.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
28-Jan-2026
Hearing.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
20-Jan-2026
Objection.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
19-Dec-2025
Objection.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
04-Nov-2025
Objection.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
17-Oct-2025
Objection.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
08-Oct-2025
Written Statement
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
28-Aug-2025
OrdersView PDF
-
28-Aug-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for a temporary injunction seeking to restrain the defendant from interfering with their peaceful possession of the disputed property (Plot No. B-319). The judge found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, demonstrate hardship, or show that the balance of convenience favored them. The court noted that a status quo order had already been issued in a related partition suit (O.S. No. 42/2025) by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, making the present application unnecessary and preventing the grant of injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Aug-2025
Written Statement
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
22-Aug-2025
Order
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
20-Aug-2025
Hearing.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
30-Jul-2025
Hearing.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
22-Jul-2025
Hearing.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
18-Jul-2025
Hearing.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
21-Jun-2025
Appearance
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi.
-
10-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 106/2025
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for a temporary injunction seeking to restrain the defendant from interfering with their peaceful possession of the disputed property (Plot No. B-319). The judge found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, demonstrate hardship, or show that the balance of convenience favored them. The court noted that a status quo order had already been issued in a related partition suit (O.S. No. 42/2025) by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, making the present application unnecessary and preventing the grant of injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts