Bharati Hanamant Sutar vs Adappa Bhimappa Sutar — 106/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/oVIIRULE1AND3. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABK710009872025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

e-Filing Number

15-05-2025

Filing Number

115/2025

Filing Date

09-06-2025

Registration No

106/2025

Registration Date

09-06-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI

Judge

871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/oVIIRULE1AND3

Petitioner(s)

Bharati Hanamant Sutar

Adv. M V Bidarikar

Jyoti Prakash Pattar

Adv. M V Bidarikar

Respondent(s)

Adappa Bhimappa Sutar

Hearing History

Judge: 871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.

17-03-2026

ORDER

17-03-2026

Restored

17-03-2026

EVIDENCE

17-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

ORDER

Interim Orders

28-08-2025
Orders
28-08-2025
Orders

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for a temporary injunction seeking to restrain the defendant from interfering with their peaceful possession of the disputed property (Plot No. B-319). The judge found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, demonstrate hardship, or show that the balance of convenience favored them. The court noted that a status quo order had already been issued in a related partition suit (O.S. No. 42/2025) by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, making the present application unnecessary and preventing the grant of injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for a temporary injunction seeking to restrain the defendant from interfering with their peaceful possession of the disputed property (Plot No. B-319). The judge found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, demonstrate hardship, or show that the balance of convenience favored them. The court noted that a status quo order had already been issued in a related partition suit (O.S. No. 42/2025) by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, making the present application unnecessary and preventing the grant of injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case