The State of Karnataka vs Moulasab Bhashasab Attar Advocate - K.S.H — 496/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304(A),283ofIPCand146,196,187ofMVAct. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABK710008502015

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

Filing Date

02-06-2015

Registration No

496/2015

Registration Date

02-06-2015

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI

Judge

119-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 279,337,338,304(A),283ofIPCand146,196,187ofMVAct

Petitioner(s)

The State of Karnataka

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Moulasab Bhashasab Attar Advocate - K.S.H

Bhashasab Gudusab Attar

Mahadev So Pundalik Aigali

Adv. N.B.G

Hearing History

Judge: 119-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

09-01-2026

EVIDENCE

28-11-2025

EVIDENCE

31-10-2025

EVIDENCE

04-10-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

25-08-2016
Plea
06-07-2017
Deposition
16-12-2022
Deposition
16-12-2022
Deposition
16-06-2023
Deposition
18-08-2023
Deposition
08-09-2023
Deposition
15-03-2024
Deposition

Summary This court order from Jamkhandi (S.S. No. 496/2015) addresses two separate cases involving fatal accidents. In both cases, witness testimony was recorded on 15-03-2024 regarding deaths that occurred in sugarcane field-related accidents. The court granted bail to both accused (Meerasab and Jarbida) under Section 3 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita with a bail bond of Rs. 100 each, and the cases were adjourned for further proceedings in the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This court order from Jamkhandi (S.S. No. 496/2015) addresses two separate cases involving fatal accidents. In both cases, witness testimony was recorded on 15-03-2024 regarding deaths that occurred in sugarcane field-related accidents. The court granted bail to both accused (Meerasab and Jarbida) under Section 3 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita with a bail bond of Rs. 100 each, and the cases were adjourned for further proceedings in the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case