Sadashiv S/o Mahalingappa Teli vs Nagaraj S/o Sadashiva Kanabur — 49/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 138NIAct. Status: HEARING.. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KABK710000922024
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
49/2024
Filing Date
11-01-2024
Registration No
49/2024
Registration Date
11-01-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sadashiv S/o Mahalingappa Teli
Adv. S.C. KARABHARI
Respondent(s)
Nagaraj S/o Sadashiva Kanabur
Hearing History
Judge: 871-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI.
HEARING.
OBJECTION.
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING. |
| 06-03-2026 | OBJECTION. |
| 03-03-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE |
| 23-02-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court: Additional Civil and Sessions Judge's Court, Jamkhandi Case No.: C.C. 49/2024 Date: 06-01-2026 The accused (P.P.N.) testified that he received ₹50,000 as a loan from the complainant in November 2022 and provided a blank signed cheque as security, which he repaid in December 2022. In 2023, a transaction of ₹6,50,000 occurred, and the accused claims the complainant filled in the cheque amount without his knowledge. The court recorded the accused's statement by fingerprint, and the plaintiff's cross-examination was adjourned for want of time. The case is pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: Additional Civil and Sessions Judge's Court, Jamkhandi Case No.: C.C. 49/2024 Date: 06-01-2026 The accused (P.P.N.) testified that he received ₹50,000 as a loan from the complainant in November 2022 and provided a blank signed cheque as security, which he repaid in December 2022. In 2023, a transaction of ₹6,50,000 occurred, and the accused claims the complainant filled in the cheque amount without his knowledge. The court recorded the accused's statement by fingerprint, and the plaintiff's cross-examination was adjourned for want of time. The case is pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts