Laxmi Nagaraj Kare vs Pramiladevi Maruti Malige — 140/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section SEC138NIACT. Status: EVIDENCES. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABK700006022025

EVIDENCES

Next Hearing

01st April 2026

Filing Number

140/2025

Filing Date

25-07-2023

Registration No

140/2025

Registration Date

08-09-2025

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI

Judge

118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section SEC138NIACT

Petitioner(s)

Laxmi Nagaraj Kare

Adv. C.R. SUTAR

Respondent(s)

Pramiladevi Maruti Malige

Hearing History

Judge: 118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI

10-03-2026

EVIDENCES

06-03-2026

EVIDENCES

28-02-2026

ORDERS

13-02-2026

HEARING

28-01-2026

HEARING

Interim Orders

18-10-2025
Deposition
10-03-2026
Deposition

Summary This is a civil case (CC No. 140/2025) before the Additional Senior Civil Judge's Court in Jamkhandi involving a chit fund (BC) dispute. The witness (Premila Devi Malagi, a 59-year-old primary school teacher) testified on 10-03-2026 that she invested ₹5,000 in a chit fund scheme organized by multiple members including Kavita Ramadurag. The witness claimed she did not receive her commission payments or the return of her cheques as promised, and denied receiving any money from the plaintiff or issuing cheques to her. The case documents multiple police complaints and court orders related to dishonored cheques. The court adjourned cross-examination of the witness and scheduled it for a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil case (CC No. 140/2025) before the Additional Senior Civil Judge's Court in Jamkhandi involving a chit fund (BC) dispute. The witness (Premila Devi Malagi, a 59-year-old primary school teacher) testified on 10-03-2026 that she invested ₹5,000 in a chit fund scheme organized by multiple members including Kavita Ramadurag. The witness claimed she did not receive her commission payments or the return of her cheques as promised, and denied receiving any money from the plaintiff or issuing cheques to her. The case documents multiple police complaints and court orders related to dishonored cheques. The court adjourned cross-examination of the witness and scheduled it for a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case