Somanning S/o Kenchappa Kadapatti vs Sangappa S/o Rachappa Chanaveer Advocate - D.T.BANGI — 148/2021
Case under U Order 7 Rule of 1 and 2 Cpc Section CPC. Status: AWAIT FURTHER ORDERS. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK700005052021
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
148/2021
Filing Date
29-10-2021
Registration No
148/2021
Registration Date
29-10-2021
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Somanning S/o Kenchappa Kadapatti
Adv. C.R.Sutar
Shivappa S/o Kenchappa Kadapatti
Adv. C.R.Sutar
Respondent(s)
Sangappa S/o Rachappa Chanaveer Advocate - D.T.BANGI
Shivalingappa S/o Sangappa Chanaveer
Adv. D.T.BANGI
Bhimappa S/o Sangappa Chanaveer
Adv. D.T.BANGI
Irappa S/o Sangappa Chanaveer
Adv. D.T.BANGI
Appasab S/o Sangappa Chanaveer
Adv. D.T.BANGI
Suryakant S/o Sangappa Chanaveer
Adv. D.T.BANGI
Chandrakant S/o Sangappa Chanaveer
Adv. D.T.BANGI
Hearing History
Judge: 118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
AWAIT FURTHER ORDERS
AWAIT FURTHER ORDERS
AWAIT FURTHER ORDERS
AWAIT FURTHER ORDERS
AWAIT FURTHER ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | AWAIT FURTHER ORDERS |
| 21-01-2026 | AWAIT FURTHER ORDERS |
| 25-11-2025 | AWAIT FURTHER ORDERS |
| 18-09-2025 | AWAIT FURTHER ORDERS |
| 19-07-2025 | AWAIT FURTHER ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Summary In OS No. 148/2021 dated 09-09-2024, the court considered a property dispute involving land ownership claims between the petitioner and defendant relatives. The court found that the petitioner's evidence regarding ancestral property rights and subsequent transfers was not sufficiently established, and dismissed the petition while directing the parties to resolve their disputes through proper legal channels if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In OS No. 148/2021 dated 09-09-2024, the court considered a property dispute involving land ownership claims between the petitioner and defendant relatives. The court found that the petitioner's evidence regarding ancestral property rights and subsequent transfers was not sufficiently established, and dismissed the petition while directing the parties to resolve their disputes through proper legal channels if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts