Sumitra W/o Ningappa Biradar vs Rayagond S/o Ramappa Holeppanavar — 154/2023
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK700005012023
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
156/2023
Filing Date
06-11-2023
Registration No
154/2023
Registration Date
07-11-2023
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sumitra W/o Ningappa Biradar
Adv. I.D.SHAIKH
Bhagirathi W/o Shivanand Solapur
Respondent(s)
Rayagond S/o Ramappa Holeppanavar
Bangarewwa W/o Mallappa Kotyal
Suvarna W/o Ravasab Namad
Rudragouda S/o Rayagond Holeppannavar
Suresh S/o Rayagond Holeppannavar
Mahesh S/o Rayagond Holeppannavar
Hearing History
Judge: 118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 12-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 10-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCES |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a civil suit (OS No. 154/2023) heard on 06-03-2026 concerning a property partition dispute in Karnataka. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of a witness (DW-2) regarding ancestral property division between Defendant 1 and his father. The witness testified about family relationships, property details, and partition discussions, but the court found certain aspects of his testimony questionable, particularly regarding survey numbers and areas of disputed lands. No further re-examination was permitted, and the case proceeded with the court's observations noted in the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a civil suit (OS No. 154/2023) heard on 06-03-2026 concerning a property partition dispute in Karnataka. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of a witness (DW-2) regarding ancestral property division between Defendant 1 and his father. The witness testified about family relationships, property details, and partition discussions, but the court found certain aspects of his testimony questionable, particularly regarding survey numbers and areas of disputed lands. No further re-examination was permitted, and the case proceeded with the court's observations noted in the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts