Gurappa S/o Basappa Tuppad vs Shivappa S/o Basappa Tupppad — 22/2020

Case under U/order 20 Rule 18 R/w Sec. 54 Cpc Section CPC. Status: Court Commissioner. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr

CNR: KABK700004642020

Court Commissioner

Next Hearing

04th April 2026

Filing Number

22/2020

Filing Date

19-12-2020

Registration No

22/2020

Registration Date

19-12-2020

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI

Judge

118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI

Acts & Sections

U/order 20 Rule 18 R/w Sec. 54 Cpc Section CPC

Petitioner(s)

Gurappa S/o Basappa Tuppad

Adv. R.N.Devararavar

Respondent(s)

Shivappa S/o Basappa Tupppad

Shivanawwa W/o Shivappa Tuppad

Laxmibai w/o Parasappa Ganiger

Jayashree W/o Mahadev Ganiger

Ishwar S/o Basappa Tuppad

Mahadevi W /o Siddappa Arakeri

Shantawwa W/o Tammanappa Kulali

Hearing History

Judge: 118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI

16-03-2026

Court Commissioner

06-03-2026

Court Commissioner

25-02-2026

Steps / Hg

11-02-2026

NOTICE

24-01-2026

Court Commissioner

Interim Orders

13-09-2021
Orders
23-12-2021
Deposition
26-03-2022
Deposition
29-07-2022
Deposition
17-08-2022
Deposition

This court order is in Kannada and pertains to a land dispute case (N.J.S.No.86/2013). The court examined complex issues regarding property ownership, succession, and land records spanning from 1932 to 1957. The judgment analyzes various survey records (schedule numbers), property divisions, and competing claims to determine rightful ownership. The court concludes by directing that the findings regarding property boundaries, ownership succession, and land classifications be recorded accordingly, with directions for further proceedings based on the established facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This court order is in Kannada and pertains to a land dispute case (N.J.S.No.86/2013). The court examined complex issues regarding property ownership, succession, and land records spanning from 1932 to 1957. The judgment analyzes various survey records (schedule numbers), property divisions, and competing claims to determine rightful ownership. The court concludes by directing that the findings regarding property boundaries, ownership succession, and land classifications be recorded accordingly, with directions for further proceedings based on the established facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case