Kallappa S/o Laxman Chippadi vs Muttanna S/o Laxman Aaragi Advocate - PRADHANI PAYAGOND — 60/2024
Case under U Order 21 Rule 11 of Cpc. Status: Notice. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KABK700004052024
e-Filing Number
23-07-2024
Filing Number
62/2024
Filing Date
25-Jul-2024
Registration No
60/2024
Registration Date
26-Jul-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
117-Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kallappa S/o Laxman Chippadi
Adv. NINGAPPA GASTI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Muttanna S/o Laxman Aaragi Advocate - PRADHANI PAYAGOND
Case History
-
16-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Notice
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
24-Feb-2026
Steps / Hg
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
14-Jan-2026
Hearing
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
16-Dec-2025
Steps / Hg
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
30-Oct-2025
Hearing
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
17-Oct-2025
Notice
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
06-Sep-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The court allowed the decree holder's application for attachment of land (R.S.No.34/1+2/1A) valued at Rs.7.34 paisa located in Muttur village, Bagalkot District, to recover earnest money of Rs.7,28,000 with 6% interest as ordered in a previous decree (O.S.No.31/2020) dated 28.03.2024. The judgment debtor's objection claiming joint family property was rejected as he failed to produce evidence supporting his claim, and the court found he was attempting to avoid satisfying the decree. The attachment order was directed to be proclaimed and communicated to relevant government offices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Sep-2025
Notice
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
04-Sep-2025
Orders
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
01-Sep-2025
Orders
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
16-Aug-2025
Orders
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
06-Aug-2025
Orders
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
31-Jul-2025
Orders
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
28-Jul-2025
Orders
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
22-Jul-2025
Orders
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
11-Jul-2025
Orders
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
09-Jul-2025
Hearing
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
02-Jul-2025
Objection
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
26-Jun-2025
Objection
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
01-Apr-2025
Objection
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
12-Mar-2025
Objection
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
10-Mar-2025
Steps / Hg
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
29-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
14-Dec-2024
Steps / Hg
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
09-Dec-2024
Lok Adalat
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
16-Nov-2024
Steps / Hg
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
14-Oct-2024
Steps / Hg
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
02-Sep-2024
Notice
Prl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi
-
27-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 60/2024
Summary: The court allowed the decree holder's application for attachment of land (R.S.No.34/1+2/1A) valued at Rs.7.34 paisa located in Muttur village, Bagalkot District, to recover earnest money of Rs.7,28,000 with 6% interest as ordered in a previous decree (O.S.No.31/2020) dated 28.03.2024. The judgment debtor's objection claiming joint family property was rejected as he failed to produce evidence supporting his claim, and the court found he was attempting to avoid satisfying the decree. The attachment order was directed to be proclaimed and communicated to relevant government offices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts