Malappa S/o Kallappa Nyamagoudar vs Madevi W/o Dashrath Madar — 8/2024
Case under U/order 7 Rule 1 C Pc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
S.C. - Small Cause Suit
CNR: KABK700003632024
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
8/2024
Filing Date
06-07-2024
Registration No
8/2024
Registration Date
08-07-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Malappa S/o Kallappa Nyamagoudar
Adv. G.I.ZALAKI
Respondent(s)
Madevi W/o Dashrath Madar
Malappa S/o Dashrath Madar
Kumar Siddappa S/o Dashrath Madar
Kumar Daivesh S/o Dasharath Madar Sl.No.2,3,and 4 are minors rptd their minor G/M N/M defendant No.1
Hearing History
Judge: 118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCES
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCES |
| 19-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCES |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case No. SC.8/2024 | Date: 06-03-2026 | Jamkhandi Court Witness testimony was recorded on oath in this civil dispute involving financial transactions between the plaintiff and deceased Dasaratha. The court examined witness statements regarding claims of monetary loans totaling Rs. 65,000 (four installments) and a promissory note allegedly issued in 2016. The witnesses' testimonies were largely inconsistent with the plaintiff's claims, with witnesses denying knowledge of the financial dealings and contradicting key allegations. The case was adjourned with no substantive order on merits at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case No. SC.8/2024 | Date: 06-03-2026 | Jamkhandi Court Witness testimony was recorded on oath in this civil dispute involving financial transactions between the plaintiff and deceased Dasaratha. The court examined witness statements regarding claims of monetary loans totaling Rs. 65,000 (four installments) and a promissory note allegedly issued in 2016. The witnesses' testimonies were largely inconsistent with the plaintiff's claims, with witnesses denying knowledge of the financial dealings and contradicting key allegations. The case was adjourned with no substantive order on merits at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts