Rahematbi W/o Rafiq Hundekar vs Noormohammad S/o Gudusab Nidoni Advocate - A.S.KOULAGIKAR — 101/2021

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section CPC. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABK700003532021

HEARING

Next Hearing

01st April 2026

Filing Number

101/2021

Filing Date

02-08-2021

Registration No

101/2021

Registration Date

02-08-2021

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI

Judge

117-PRL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section CPC

Petitioner(s)

Rahematbi W/o Rafiq Hundekar

Adv. P.V.Kulkarni

Respondent(s)

Noormohammad S/o Gudusab Nidoni Advocate - A.S.KOULAGIKAR

Umarasab S/o Gudusab Nidoni

Adv. A.P.Kulkarni

Mumatazbegaum W/o Allaboz Biradar

Dulanbi W/o Maliksab Ballur

Maimuna W/o Rajaksab Ballur

Mahaboobi W/o Gudusab Nidoni

Adv. A.P.KULAKARNI

Hearing History

Judge: 117-PRL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI

10-03-2026

HEARING

06-03-2026

HEARING

13-02-2026

OBJECTION

05-02-2026

OBJECTION

23-01-2026

OBJECTION

Interim Orders

04-08-2021
Orders
07-03-2022
Deposition
07-12-2022
Orders
22-01-2025
Orders
27-06-2025
Orders
14-07-2025
Issue
04-09-2025
Deposition

On 04.09.2025, witness PW-1 was recalled and examined. Cross-examination by defendants 1, 2, 6, 7, and 9 was rejected as their counsel sought adjournment without valid reasons, resulting in dismissal of the cross-examination request. Cross-examination by defendant 8 was also rejected due to non-appearance, and defendant 10's cross-examination was similarly dismissed when counsel failed to provide adequate grounds for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

On 04.09.2025, witness PW-1 was recalled and examined. Cross-examination by defendants 1, 2, 6, 7, and 9 was rejected as their counsel sought adjournment without valid reasons, resulting in dismissal of the cross-examination request. Cross-examination by defendant 8 was also rejected due to non-appearance, and defendant 10's cross-examination was similarly dismissed when counsel failed to provide adequate grounds for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case