The State of Karnataka R/by Savalagi PS vs Sadashiv S/o Hanamant Golabavi Advocate - S.C.KARABHARI — 30/2022
Case under 457 380 Ipc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KABK700003112022
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
30/2022
Filing Date
28-06-2022
Registration No
30/2022
Registration Date
28-06-2022
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
117-PRL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Karnataka R/by Savalagi PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sadashiv S/o Hanamant Golabavi Advocate - S.C.KARABHARI
Hanamant S/o Nayku Ranakambi @ Marate
Adv. S.B.ALGUR
Hearing History
Judge: 117-PRL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 23-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 16-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 27-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: CC 30/2022 | Court: J.M.F.C., Jamkhandi Accused: Sadashiv Golabhavi and another Charge: Motor theft (6 motors worth ₹6,000 stolen from a warehouse) Outcome: The accused's statement under CrPC Section 313 was recorded on 05.11.2025. The accused denied all prosecution witness allegations, consistently claiming the witnesses' testimonies were false. The court documented the accused's responses to 14 questions regarding the theft charges, the recovery of stolen motors, and police procedures. The case remains under trial with no final verdict delivered in this order—this document captures only the examination-in-chief of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: CC 30/2022 | Court: J.M.F.C., Jamkhandi Accused: Sadashiv Golabhavi and another Charge: Motor theft (6 motors worth ₹6,000 stolen from a warehouse) Outcome: The accused's statement under CrPC Section 313 was recorded on 05.11.2025. The accused denied all prosecution witness allegations, consistently claiming the witnesses' testimonies were false. The court documented the accused's responses to 14 questions regarding the theft charges, the recovery of stolen motors, and police procedures. The case remains under trial with no final verdict delivered in this order—this document captures only the examination-in-chief of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts