Laxman S/o Yankappa Urf Venkappa Nayak Urf Naik vs Naraharisetty Sudhakar S/o Krishna — 161/2025

Case under U Sec 166 of M V Act 1998. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 24-Mar-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KABK700002122025

Filing Number

161/2025

Filing Date

29-Mar-2025

Registration No

161/2025

Registration Date

08-Apr-2025

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI

Judge

118-Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

U Sec 166 of M V Act 1998

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Laxman S/o Yankappa Urf Venkappa Nayak Urf Naik

    Adv. C.K.PACHANNAVAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Naraharisetty Sudhakar S/o Krishna

  2. 2.The Branch Manager SBI General Insurance co ltd

Case History

  1. 24-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidences

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    The court examined witness testimony on 27-02-2026 in Motor Vehicles Case No. 161/2025 regarding disability claims following an accident. The defendant (respondent's counsel) challenged the plaintiff's disability certificate, arguing that the plaintiff received adequate treatment and that any remaining disability was due to the serious nature of the injury rather than medical negligence, while disputing inaccuracies in the disability assessment documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidences

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidences

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidences

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  10. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidences

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  11. 17-Jan-2026

    ExhibitsView PDF

  12. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidences

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  13. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidences

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  14. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidences

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  15. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidences

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  16. 20-Nov-2025

    Notice

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  17. 25-Oct-2025

    Notice

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  18. 06-Oct-2025

    Notice

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  19. 26-Sep-2025

    Written statement

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  20. 15-Sep-2025

    Written statement

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  21. 30-Aug-2025

    Written statement

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  22. 14-Aug-2025

    Written statement

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  23. 01-Aug-2025

    Written statement

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  24. 21-Jul-2025

    Written statement

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  25. 14-Jul-2025

    Written statement

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  26. 07-Jul-2025

    Notice

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  27. 23-Jun-2025

    Written statement

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  28. 16-Jun-2025

    Written statement

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  29. 09-May-2025

    Notice

    Addl.sr.civil Judge And JMFC Jamkhandi

  30. 09-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 29-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 161/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court examined witness testimony on 27-02-2026 in Motor Vehicles Case No. 161/2025 regarding disability claims following an accident. The defendant (respondent's counsel) challenged the plaintiff's disability certificate, arguing that the plaintiff received adequate treatment and that any remaining disability was due to the serious nature of the injury rather than medical negligence, while disputing inaccuracies in the disability assessment documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case