Laxman S/o Yankappa Urf Venkappa Nayak Urf Naik vs Naraharisetty Sudhakar S/o Krishna — 161/2025
Case under U Sec 166 of M V Act 1998. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KABK700002122025
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
161/2025
Filing Date
29-03-2025
Registration No
161/2025
Registration Date
08-04-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxman S/o Yankappa Urf Venkappa Nayak Urf Naik
Adv. C.K.PACHANNAVAR
Respondent(s)
Naraharisetty Sudhakar S/o Krishna
The Branch Manager SBI General Insurance co ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCES
EVIDENCES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 10-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCES |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCES |
Interim Orders
The court examined witness testimony on 27-02-2026 in Motor Vehicles Case No. 161/2025 regarding disability claims following an accident. The defendant (respondent's counsel) challenged the plaintiff's disability certificate, arguing that the plaintiff received adequate treatment and that any remaining disability was due to the serious nature of the injury rather than medical negligence, while disputing inaccuracies in the disability assessment documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court examined witness testimony on 27-02-2026 in Motor Vehicles Case No. 161/2025 regarding disability claims following an accident. The defendant (respondent's counsel) challenged the plaintiff's disability certificate, arguing that the plaintiff received adequate treatment and that any remaining disability was due to the serious nature of the injury rather than medical negligence, while disputing inaccuracies in the disability assessment documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts