Chanagoud S/o Sidagoud Biradar vs Vijay S/o Manikrao Gayakawad — 160/2025

Case under U Sec 166 of M V Act 1998. Status: EVIDENCES. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KABK700002112025

EVIDENCES

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

Filing Number

160/2025

Filing Date

29-03-2025

Registration No

160/2025

Registration Date

08-04-2025

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI

Judge

118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI

Acts & Sections

U Sec 166 of M V Act 1998

Petitioner(s)

Chanagoud S/o Sidagoud Biradar

Adv. C.K.PACHANNAVAR

Respondent(s)

Vijay S/o Manikrao Gayakawad

The Branch Manager Tata AIG General Insurance Co Ltd

Hearing History

Judge: 118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI

13-03-2026

EVIDENCES

06-03-2026

EVIDENCES

27-02-2026

EVIDENCES

16-02-2026

EVIDENCES

03-02-2026

EVIDENCES

Interim Orders

19-01-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition

Summary: In this Motor Vehicles Claim (M.V.C) No. 160/2025 proceeding dated 06-03-2026, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness PW-1 (plaintiff/claimant) regarding a motor vehicle accident. The witness testified about the accident circumstances, injuries sustained (left shoulder and right leg injuries), medical treatment costs incurred (approximately 5 lakhs with 1 lakh more required), and claimed loss of earning capacity. No formal order disposing the petition was issued in this hearing; the court merely recorded the witness testimony and cross-examination is pending, with no further adjournment announced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this Motor Vehicles Claim (M.V.C) No. 160/2025 proceeding dated 06-03-2026, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness PW-1 (plaintiff/claimant) regarding a motor vehicle accident. The witness testified about the accident circumstances, injuries sustained (left shoulder and right leg injuries), medical treatment costs incurred (approximately 5 lakhs with 1 lakh more required), and claimed loss of earning capacity. No formal order disposing the petition was issued in this hearing; the court merely recorded the witness testimony and cross-examination is pending, with no further adjournment announced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case