Chanagoud S/o Sidagoud Biradar vs Vijay S/o Manikrao Gayakawad — 160/2025
Case under U Sec 166 of M V Act 1998. Status: EVIDENCES. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KABK700002112025
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
160/2025
Filing Date
29-03-2025
Registration No
160/2025
Registration Date
08-04-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chanagoud S/o Sidagoud Biradar
Adv. C.K.PACHANNAVAR
Respondent(s)
Vijay S/o Manikrao Gayakawad
The Branch Manager Tata AIG General Insurance Co Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 118-ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
EVIDENCES
EVIDENCES
EVIDENCES
EVIDENCES
EVIDENCES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCES |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCES |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCES |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCES |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCES |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this Motor Vehicles Claim (M.V.C) No. 160/2025 proceeding dated 06-03-2026, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness PW-1 (plaintiff/claimant) regarding a motor vehicle accident. The witness testified about the accident circumstances, injuries sustained (left shoulder and right leg injuries), medical treatment costs incurred (approximately 5 lakhs with 1 lakh more required), and claimed loss of earning capacity. No formal order disposing the petition was issued in this hearing; the court merely recorded the witness testimony and cross-examination is pending, with no further adjournment announced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this Motor Vehicles Claim (M.V.C) No. 160/2025 proceeding dated 06-03-2026, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness PW-1 (plaintiff/claimant) regarding a motor vehicle accident. The witness testified about the accident circumstances, injuries sustained (left shoulder and right leg injuries), medical treatment costs incurred (approximately 5 lakhs with 1 lakh more required), and claimed loss of earning capacity. No formal order disposing the petition was issued in this hearing; the court merely recorded the witness testimony and cross-examination is pending, with no further adjournment announced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts