Smt Dhondubai Pandu Bhoraganvkar vs Hariba S/o Pandu Bhoraganvkar — 11/2008
Case under U/sec.54 R/w Order 20 Rule 18 Cpc. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KABK700001082008
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Date
11-03-2008
Registration No
11/2008
Registration Date
11-03-2008
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAMKHANDI
Judge
117-PRL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt Dhondubai Pandu Bhoraganvkar
Adv. A.P.KULKARNI
Chaya W/o Suresh Patoli
Adv. A.P.KULAKARNI
Respondent(s)
Hariba S/o Pandu Bhoraganvkar
Shoba W/o Hariba Boragawkar
Adv. C.R.Sutar
Pandurang W/o Hariba Boragawkar
Adv. C.R.Sutar
Appashi S/o Bhimashi Boragawkar
Adv. V.M.KUBAKADDI
Basayya S/o Shankraya Matapati
Adv. V.M.KUBAKADDI
Hearing History
Judge: 117-PRL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAMKHANDI
HEARING
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 13-02-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 05-02-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 12-01-2026 | OBJECTION |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed both applications (I.A. No.9 and I.A. No.6) filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) r/w 151 of CPC. The applicant, Smt. Shobha (wife of deceased Hariba), was impleaded as respondent No.6 in FDP.No.11/2008 and respondent No.4 in FDP.No.14/2008 in the final decree proceedings. The court found her to be a necessary and proper party since she claims to be the legally wedded wife of the deceased after his divorce from the first wife was finalized in 1998, and her marriage in 2001 makes her eligible to participate in the partition proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed both applications (I.A. No.9 and I.A. No.6) filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) r/w 151 of CPC. The applicant, Smt. Shobha (wife of deceased Hariba), was impleaded as respondent No.6 in FDP.No.11/2008 and respondent No.4 in FDP.No.14/2008 in the final decree proceedings. The court found her to be a necessary and proper party since she claims to be the legally wedded wife of the deceased after his divorce from the first wife was finalized in 1998, and her marriage in 2001 makes her eligible to participate in the partition proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts