Shri. Anil S/o Nijagunappa Masali vs Smt. Seeta W/o Sadashiv Hadalagi Advocate - ARAVIND JAYANTILAL VYAS — 402/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule2ofcpc. Status: EVIDENCEs. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABK610040642022

EVIDENCEs

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

402/2022

Filing Date

25-10-2022

Registration No

402/2022

Registration Date

25-10-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI

Judge

579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule2ofcpc

Petitioner(s)

Shri. Anil S/o Nijagunappa Masali

Adv. R R KAMAGOND

Respondent(s)

Smt. Seeta W/o Sadashiv Hadalagi Advocate - ARAVIND JAYANTILAL VYAS

Hearing History

Judge: 579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

06-03-2026

EVIDENCEs

30-01-2026

EVIDENCEs

21-01-2026

EVIDENCEs

08-12-2025

EVIDENCEs

03-11-2025

EVIDENCEs

Interim Orders

28-06-2024
Issue
30-01-2026
Deposition

The court order (Case No. 402/2022, Karnataka High Court) dated 30-01-2026 deals with a family dispute involving money deposited by one party. The court directed that Rs. 1,50,000 deposited on 01-02-2022 be returned to the defendant within the stipulated timeframe, and ordered the plaintiff to return certain amounts (Rs. 30,000, Rs. 25,000, Rs. 2,000, and Rs. 1,000) previously received. The petition is disposed of with directions for monetary adjustments between the parties regarding the disputed funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court order (Case No. 402/2022, Karnataka High Court) dated 30-01-2026 deals with a family dispute involving money deposited by one party. The court directed that Rs. 1,50,000 deposited on 01-02-2022 be returned to the defendant within the stipulated timeframe, and ordered the plaintiff to return certain amounts (Rs. 30,000, Rs. 25,000, Rs. 2,000, and Rs. 1,000) previously received. The petition is disposed of with directions for monetary adjustments between the parties regarding the disputed funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case