Rustam S/o Shaukat Nadaf vs The Tahasildar Mudhol — 426/2025
Case under 13.3 of the Registration of B and D Act 1969 R/w. Rule 10.3 Section B and D Act. Status: Order. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KABK610034542025
e-Filing Number
10-12-2025
Filing Number
426/2025
Filing Date
16-Dec-2025
Registration No
426/2025
Registration Date
16-Dec-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI
Judge
579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rustam S/o Shaukat Nadaf
Adv. S.A.YADALLI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tahasildar Mudhol
-
2.Village Accountant, Marapur
Case History
-
02-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
13-Mar-2026
Refer to Lok-adalat
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
12-Mar-2026
Settlement
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
17-Feb-2026
Order
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary: In Crl. Misc No. 426/2025, the petitioner's examination-in-chief was conducted on 29-01-2026 before the Civil Judge & JMFC at Banahatti. The petitioner testified via affidavit and submitted four documentary exhibits including a non-availability certificate, school leaving certificate, translator's affidavit, and Aadhar card. Cross-examination of the witness was marked as nil due to the respondent's absence from court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Jan-2026
Order
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
30-Dec-2025
Notice
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
16-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 426/2025
Summary: In Crl. Misc No. 426/2025, the petitioner's examination-in-chief was conducted on 29-01-2026 before the Civil Judge & JMFC at Banahatti. The petitioner testified via affidavit and submitted four documentary exhibits including a non-availability certificate, school leaving certificate, translator's affidavit, and Aadhar card. Cross-examination of the witness was marked as nil due to the respondent's absence from court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts