Sri. Siddu Savadi Sou. Sahakari Sangha Ni. Banahatti Reptd Sri. Sheshagiri S/o Shrinivas Joshi vs Sri. Ananda S/o Shankareppa Badagandi — 2078/2023
Case under 138 of N I Act Section act. Status: APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KABK610033982023
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
Filing Number
2078/2023
Filing Date
26-12-2023
Registration No
2078/2023
Registration Date
26-12-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI
Judge
579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri. Siddu Savadi Sou. Sahakari Sangha Ni. Banahatti Reptd Sri. Sheshagiri S/o Shrinivas Joshi
Adv. S.S.Shanmukh
Respondent(s)
Sri. Ananda S/o Shankareppa Badagandi
Hearing History
Judge: 579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
EVIDENCEs
EVIDENCEs
EVIDENCEs
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 06-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCEs |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCEs |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCEs |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: C.C No.2078/2023 Court: First Grade Judicial Magistrate's Court, Banahatti Accused: Anand Badagandi (40 years old, Driver) Outcome: The accused was questioned under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding cheque dishonor proceedings. A cheque for ₹69,172 issued on 05.09.2023 was returned on 13.09.2023 with the remark "Drawer Signature Differs." The accused declined to call witnesses or make any statement in his defense, and the court recorded his responses on 27.01.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: C.C No.2078/2023 Court: First Grade Judicial Magistrate's Court, Banahatti Accused: Anand Badagandi (40 years old, Driver) Outcome: The accused was questioned under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding cheque dishonor proceedings. A cheque for ₹69,172 issued on 05.09.2023 was returned on 13.09.2023 with the remark "Drawer Signature Differs." The accused declined to call witnesses or make any statement in his defense, and the court recorded his responses on 27.01.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts