Chetan S/o Devadas Kale vs Rahula S/o Ratan Shikkalagar — 2040/2023

Case under U/s 138 of Ni Act Section Act. Status: APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABK610032992023

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

Filing Number

2040/2023

Filing Date

13-12-2023

Registration No

2040/2023

Registration Date

13-12-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI

Judge

579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

Acts & Sections

U/s 138 of Ni Act Section Act

Petitioner(s)

Chetan S/o Devadas Kale

Adv. G.S.AMMANAGIMATH

Respondent(s)

Rahula S/o Ratan Shikkalagar

Hearing History

Judge: 579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

06-03-2026

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

31-01-2026

EVIDENCEs

18-12-2025

EVIDENCEs

26-09-2025

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

25-09-2025

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

Interim Orders

18-12-2025
Plea

Summary of Court Orders Case CC 1163/2024: Charges framed against accused under Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque of ₹5,43,170 that bounced due to insufficient funds; accused acknowledged the charges and elected to proceed to trial. Case CC 1028/2024: Charges framed against accused under N.I. Act Section 138 for a bounced cheque of ₹80,000; accused understood the charges and chose trial instead of pleading guilty. Case CC 273/2025: Charges framed under N.I. Act Section 138 for cheque of ₹85,426 that was returned due to insufficient funds; accused admitted understanding charges and opted for trial. Case CC 1978/2024: Charges framed against accused under N.I. Act Section 138 for three bounced cheques totaling ₹15,00,000; accused understood and elected to proceed to trial. Case CC 2040/2023: Charges framed under N.I. Act Section 138 for ₹2,00,000 cheque that bounced; accused acknowledged charges and chose trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Orders Case CC 1163/2024: Charges framed against accused under Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque of ₹5,43,170 that bounced due to insufficient funds; accused acknowledged the charges and elected to proceed to trial. Case CC 1028/2024: Charges framed against accused under N.I. Act Section 138 for a bounced cheque of ₹80,000; accused understood the charges and chose trial instead of pleading guilty. Case CC 273/2025: Charges framed under N.I. Act Section 138 for cheque of ₹85,426 that was returned due to insufficient funds; accused admitted understanding charges and opted for trial. Case CC 1978/2024: Charges framed against accused under N.I. Act Section 138 for three bounced cheques totaling ₹15,00,000; accused understood and elected to proceed to trial. Case CC 2040/2023: Charges framed under N.I. Act Section 138 for ₹2,00,000 cheque that bounced; accused acknowledged charges and chose trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case