Sri. Laxmi Traders, R/by Sri. Praveen S/o Jayavant Kanagond vs Avinash S/o Shivaji Manjale, Propr. Sri. Laxmi Traders — 235/2021

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 00. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 07-Apr-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABK610026932021

Filing Number

235/2021

Filing Date

04-Dec-2021

Registration No

235/2021

Registration Date

04-Dec-2021

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI

Judge

579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sri. Laxmi Traders, R/by Sri. Praveen S/o Jayavant Kanagond

    Adv. ARAVIND JAYANTILAL VYAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Avinash S/o Shivaji Manjale, Propr. Sri. Laxmi Traders

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Settlement

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  8. 09-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  9. 05-Nov-2025

    Settlement

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  10. 14-Aug-2025

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  11. 09-Jul-2025

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  12. 20-Jun-2025

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  13. 26-Mar-2025

    Settlement

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  14. 06-Feb-2025

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  15. 13-Jan-2025

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  16. 05-Nov-2024

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  17. 21-Oct-2024

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary In Original Case No. 235/2021, the court order dated 21-10-2024 addresses a monetary dispute involving property and funds. The court found that the petitioner is entitled to Rs. 1 lakh from the respondent as compensation for disputed property matters, with Rs. 50,000 to be paid immediately and the remaining Rs. 1-2 lakh to be settled subsequently. The case disposition is set for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 21-Oct-2024

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  19. 02-Sep-2024

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  20. 11-Jul-2024

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  21. 22-Apr-2024

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  22. 06-Feb-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  23. 06-Feb-2024

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  24. 08-Nov-2023

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  25. 07-Aug-2023

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  26. 14-Jun-2023

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  27. 07-Mar-2023

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  28. 05-Jan-2023

    IssueView PDF

  29. 05-Jan-2023

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  30. 29-Nov-2022

    Issues

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  31. 19-Oct-2022

    Compliance

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  32. 14-Sep-2022

    EVIDENCEs

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  33. 17-Aug-2022

    written statement

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  34. 21-Jun-2022

    written statement

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  35. 30-Mar-2022

    Summons

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  36. 19-Feb-2022

    Summons

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  37. 10-Jan-2022

    Summons

    Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti

  38. 04-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 04-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 235/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Original Case No. 235/2021, the court order dated 21-10-2024 addresses a monetary dispute involving property and funds. The court found that the petitioner is entitled to Rs. 1 lakh from the respondent as compensation for disputed property matters, with Rs. 50,000 to be paid immediately and the remaining Rs. 1-2 lakh to be settled subsequently. The case disposition is set for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case