Manager, Manju Vishwanath Cr. Sou.Sahak. Ltd. MLP Reptd by Sri. Anil Neelakantappa Mundaganur vs Govindakumar S/o Bhimappa Shindhe — 1771/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223,138NIACT. Status: EVIDENCEs. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KABK610026872025
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
1771/2025
Filing Date
23-09-2025
Registration No
1771/2025
Registration Date
23-09-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI
Judge
579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manager, Manju Vishwanath Cr. Sou.Sahak. Ltd. MLP Reptd by Sri. Anil Neelakantappa Mundaganur
Adv. S.G.KOUJALGI
Respondent(s)
Govindakumar S/o Bhimappa Shindhe
Hearing History
Judge: 579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
EVIDENCEs
FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCEs |
| 25-02-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA |
| 09-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 28-10-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 23-09-2025 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: CC 1771/2025, First Judicial Magistrate Court, Banihatti Outcome: The accused was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for ₹1,08,785 dated 26.03.2025 that bounced due to "Funds Insufficient." After the cheque was dishonored, a legal notice was sent on 25.04.2025 and received on 09.05.2025. Despite 15 days passing, the accused failed to pay the amount. The accused pleaded to contest the charges and the case has been scheduled for trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: CC 1771/2025, First Judicial Magistrate Court, Banihatti Outcome: The accused was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for ₹1,08,785 dated 26.03.2025 that bounced due to "Funds Insufficient." After the cheque was dishonored, a legal notice was sent on 25.04.2025 and received on 09.05.2025. Despite 15 days passing, the accused failed to pay the amount. The accused pleaded to contest the charges and the case has been scheduled for trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts