Mahadev Mahalingappa Chamaker vs Basavaraj Lakkappa Chamakeri — 147/2022
Case under Birth and Death Act 1969 U/s 13.3 Section CPC. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK610016632022
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
Filing Number
147/2022
Filing Date
22-03-2022
Registration No
147/2022
Registration Date
22-03-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI
Judge
579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahadev Mahalingappa Chamaker
Adv. L S Avaradi
Ashok Mahalingappa Chamakeri
Respondent(s)
Basavaraj Lakkappa Chamakeri
Smt. Kalawwa Adrushappa Kalatippi
Smt. Tippawwa Gangappa Shegunashi
Smt. Bandawwa Bellappa Tiraki
Smt. Mahadevi Siddappa Silavant
Smt. Subbawwa Jayavant Kokatanur
Smt. Sarasvati Irappa Kulli
Smt. Sharada Irappa Munnolli
Hearing History
Judge: 579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCEs
EVIDENCEs
EVIDENCEs
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCEs |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCEs |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCEs |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: Original Suit No. 147/2022 Court: Bengaluru (Karnataka) Order Date: 19-02-2026 Outcome: The court's judgment pertains to a property dispute involving two land parcels (CTS No. 240 and 241). The court examined ownership claims and historical records dating to 1952, analyzing survey measurements and deed registrations. The judgment establishes the boundaries and ownership status of both properties, determining that the defendant's claim to certain portions (282 square meters of CTS No. 241) is valid based on historical deeds, while clarifying the respective rights of parties over the disputed land parcels with precise dimensional specifications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: Original Suit No. 147/2022 Court: Bengaluru (Karnataka) Order Date: 19-02-2026 Outcome: The court's judgment pertains to a property dispute involving two land parcels (CTS No. 240 and 241). The court examined ownership claims and historical records dating to 1952, analyzing survey measurements and deed registrations. The judgment establishes the boundaries and ownership status of both properties, determining that the defendant's claim to certain portions (282 square meters of CTS No. 241) is valid based on historical deeds, while clarifying the respective rights of parties over the disputed land parcels with precise dimensional specifications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts