Smt. Radha @ Bebi W/o Ramesh Hongal vs CTS Officer, Rabkavi-Banahatti — 127/2021
Case under U Order 7 Rule of 1 and 2 Cpc Section 00. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK610012242021
Filing Number
127/2021
Filing Date
16-Jul-2021
Registration No
127/2021
Registration Date
16-Jul-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI
Judge
579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. Radha @ Bebi W/o Ramesh Hongal
Adv. S P PATTAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.CTS Officer, Rabkavi-Banahatti
-
2.Assistant Director of Land Records
-
3.Deputy Director of Land Records
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit seeking mandatory injunction to correct property records from "ancestral property" to "self-acquired property." The court held that such relief falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of revenue authorities under Section 61 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and civil courts lack jurisdiction over revenue record rectification matters. The plaintiff was directed to approach the competent revenue authorities instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
07-Jan-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
09-Dec-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
13-Nov-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
21-Jul-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
22-Apr-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
05-Feb-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
18-Dec-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
30-Oct-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
30-Aug-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
23-Jul-2024
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
31-May-2024
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
04-Apr-2024
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
14-Feb-2024
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
09-Jan-2024
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
25-Oct-2023
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
22-Aug-2023
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
22-May-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
09-Mar-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
08-Mar-2023
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
30-Jan-2023
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
03-Dec-2022
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
31-Oct-2022
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
28-Sep-2022
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
08-Aug-2022
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
30-Jul-2022
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
12-Jul-2022
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
27-May-2022
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
08-Apr-2022
objection
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
24-Mar-2022
written statement
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
19-Jan-2022
written statement
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
11-Jan-2022
written statement
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
01-Dec-2021
written statement
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
26-Oct-2021
written statement
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
16-Sep-2021
written statement
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
16-Aug-2021
written statement
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
16-Jul-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jul-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 127/2021
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit seeking mandatory injunction to correct property records from "ancestral property" to "self-acquired property." The court held that such relief falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of revenue authorities under Section 61 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and civil courts lack jurisdiction over revenue record rectification matters. The plaintiff was directed to approach the competent revenue authorities instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts