Malik S/o Mubarak Dange vs The Registrar of Birth and Deaths officer, CMC Rabakavi-Banahatti. — 87/2026
Case under 13.3 of the Registration of B and D Act 1969 R/w. Rule 10.3 Section B and D Act. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled in Lok Adalath on 14th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KABK610003312026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
87/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
87/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI
Judge
579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled in Lok Adalath
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Malik S/o Mubarak Dange
Adv. SHRI. Z. L. KHALEEFA
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Registrar of Birth and Deaths officer, CMC Rabakavi-Banahatti.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
The Lok-Adalath allowed a joint compromise memo filed by both parties and directed the respondent to register the date of birth (07-06-1997) of petitioner Shri. Malik S/o Mubarak Dange in official records and issue a birth certificate upon payment of necessary fees. The petition was disposed of as per the agreed terms after the court confirmed the compromise was entered voluntarily without legal impediment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
13-Mar-2026
Refer to Lok-adalat
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
06-Mar-2026
Notice
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 87/2026
The Lok-Adalath allowed a joint compromise memo filed by both parties and directed the respondent to register the date of birth (07-06-1997) of petitioner Shri. Malik S/o Mubarak Dange in official records and issue a birth certificate upon payment of necessary fees. The petition was disposed of as per the agreed terms after the court confirmed the compromise was entered voluntarily without legal impediment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts