Shri. Ashok S/o Dhareppa Shiragond vs Shri. Appasab S/o Bharamappa Alappanavar — 18/2025
Case under U/s 138 of Ni Act Section act. Status: EVIDENCEs. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KABK610000512025
Filing Number
18/2025
Filing Date
13-Jan-2025
Registration No
18/2025
Registration Date
13-Jan-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI
Judge
579-Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri. Ashok S/o Dhareppa Shiragond
Adv. V.B. KHEMANNAVAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shri. Appasab S/o Bharamappa Alappanavar
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Deposition
-
06-Mar-2026
EVIDENCEs
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
02-Mar-2026
EVIDENCEs
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
28-Jan-2026
Plea
Summary The court charged the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 6,00,000 dated 19.10.2024 that was returned with "Funds Insufficient" status. The accused was read the charges in Kannada and confirmed understanding. The accused chose to contest the charges rather than plead guilty, and the matter is set for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Jan-2026
EVIDENCEs
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
27-Oct-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
25-Jul-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
19-May-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
26-Mar-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Civil Judge and JMFC Banahatti
-
13-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 18/2025
Summary The court charged the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 6,00,000 dated 19.10.2024 that was returned with "Funds Insufficient" status. The accused was read the charges in Kannada and confirmed understanding. The accused chose to contest the charges rather than plead guilty, and the matter is set for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts