Santosh M/o.Lakkawwa Mang vs Ashok M/o.Sabavva Madar @ Mang — 494/2021
Case under Sec 166 of M V Act Section 1. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KABK600013352021
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
494/2021
Filing Date
14-12-2021
Registration No
494/2021
Registration Date
14-12-2021
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANAHATTI
Judge
1212-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santosh M/o.Lakkawwa Mang
Adv. T.H. Sathabachche
Respondent(s)
Ashok M/o.Sabavva Madar @ Mang
Ramanna S/o.Leshappa Bujuruk Dead by his LR's
Smt.Kamalawwa W/o.Ramanna Bujuruk
Manager, IFFCO TOKIO Gen Insu. Comp. Ltd, Nubballi
Adv. V.V.Tulasiger
Hearing History
Judge: 1212-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 13-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 31-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary In MVC No. 494/2021, the court examined a motor vehicle accident case (dated 02-07-2025) involving a 19-year-old claimant injured in a two-wheeler accident in Jamkhandi. The court found the claimant's witness testimony contained false statements regarding injuries, treatment costs (₹1,50,000), and permanent disability claims. The court determined that the owner of the motorcycle (first defendant) is liable for compensation, while the fourth defendant is not liable due to proper separation of seats between driver and passenger. The case proceeds to assess damages based on the established liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In MVC No. 494/2021, the court examined a motor vehicle accident case (dated 02-07-2025) involving a 19-year-old claimant injured in a two-wheeler accident in Jamkhandi. The court found the claimant's witness testimony contained false statements regarding injuries, treatment costs (₹1,50,000), and permanent disability claims. The court determined that the owner of the motorcycle (first defendant) is liable for compensation, while the fourth defendant is not liable due to proper separation of seats between driver and passenger. The case proceeds to assess damages based on the established liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts