Prakash S/o Mallappa Paschapur vs Chayappagouda S/o Solabanagouda Patil — 589/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KABK600008422023
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
589/2023
Filing Date
11-12-2023
Registration No
589/2023
Registration Date
11-12-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANAHATTI
Judge
1212-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prakash S/o Mallappa Paschapur
Adv. S.G.Koujalagi
Respondent(s)
Chayappagouda S/o Solabanagouda Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1212-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 28-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 12-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 02-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary Case No. MVC 589/2023 - Civil court order dated 28-10-2025. The plaintiff's witness testified regarding a motor vehicle accident involving a tractor that allegedly hit the plaintiff's motorcycle on 28-10-2023, causing injury to the plaintiff's leg. The court examined the evidence presented by both parties, including witness statements and the police report, and found certain assertions by the plaintiff's witness to be false or unsupported. The court determined issues of liability and damages based on the facts established through testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case No. MVC 589/2023 - Civil court order dated 28-10-2025. The plaintiff's witness testified regarding a motor vehicle accident involving a tractor that allegedly hit the plaintiff's motorcycle on 28-10-2023, causing injury to the plaintiff's leg. The court examined the evidence presented by both parties, including witness statements and the police report, and found certain assertions by the plaintiff's witness to be false or unsupported. The court determined issues of liability and damages based on the facts established through testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts