Siddram Ghulappa Bhilawadi, vs Prabhu Doddayamanappa Naik — 270/2024
Case under Sec149 Cpc Section Order7Rule1. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK600006142024
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
e-Filing Number
28-10-2024
Filing Number
270/2024
Filing Date
30-10-2024
Registration No
270/2024
Registration Date
30-10-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANAHATTI
Judge
1212-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Siddram Ghulappa Bhilawadi,
Adv. Aravind Vyas
Vijaykumar Shrishailappa Nasi
Adv. Aravind Vyas
Basavaraj Prabhakar Karehonna,
Adv. Aravind Vyas
Shrishail Dundappa Vajjaramatti
Adv. Aravind Vyas
Bhimappa Parappa Patil
Adv. Aravind Vyas
Respondent(s)
Prabhu Doddayamanappa Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 1212-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 03-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 19-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-01-2026 | ORDER |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Original Suit No. 270/2024 | Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Banahatti | Dated: 19 January 2026 Outcome: The plaintiffs' application (I.A. No. III) seeking permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit has been rejected. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish sufficient grounds under Order 23 Rule 1(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, as the proposed changes would alter the entire nature of the case rather than cure a mere formal defect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Original Suit No. 270/2024 | Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Banahatti | Dated: 19 January 2026 Outcome: The plaintiffs' application (I.A. No. III) seeking permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit has been rejected. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish sufficient grounds under Order 23 Rule 1(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, as the proposed changes would alter the entire nature of the case rather than cure a mere formal defect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts