The Karnataka Bank Ltd rep by Iranna Nagarl S/o Basanagouda Nagaral vs Shri Ningappa S/o Irappa Horatti — 115/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 16th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK600002262024
Filing Number
115/2024
Filing Date
19-03-2024
Registration No
115/2024
Registration Date
19-03-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANAHATTI
Judge
1212-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Karnataka Bank Ltd rep by Iranna Nagarl S/o Basanagouda Nagaral
Adv. M.S. MANNAYANAVARMATH
Respondent(s)
Shri Ningappa S/o Irappa Horatti
Shri Appanna S/o Irappa Horatti
Shri Tammanna S/o Irappa Horatti
Shri Mallappa S/o Appasaheb B Patil (died) 4(a) Smt. Bourawwa W/o Mallappa B Patil
4(b) Shri Chanrashekhar S/o Mallappa B Patil
4(c) Smt. Neelawwa W/o Mallappa Rotti
Smt. Mahadevi W/o Yamanappa Tatti
Hearing History
Judge: 1212-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 20-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 28-10-2025 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary In Civil Case No. 115/2024, the court heard evidence from the plaintiff's witness on 06-03-2026 and found the testimony and supporting documents (loan account statement, loan agreement, contract, mortgage deed, and acknowledgment) to be credible and truthful. The defendant did not contest the evidence, and the court admitted all five documents as exhibits. The court is inclined to decide the case in favor of the plaintiff based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Civil Case No. 115/2024, the court heard evidence from the plaintiff's witness on 06-03-2026 and found the testimony and supporting documents (loan account statement, loan agreement, contract, mortgage deed, and acknowledgment) to be credible and truthful. The defendant did not contest the evidence, and the court admitted all five documents as exhibits. The court is inclined to decide the case in favor of the plaintiff based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts