Shri. Bhujabali S/o Bhimappa Alagur vs S. L. A. O. Hipparagi Dam project — 9/2016
Case under Order 18 Rule 17 Cpc. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases
CNR: KABK600002092016
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
9/2016
Filing Date
22-08-2016
Registration No
9/2016
Registration Date
22-08-2016
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANAHATTI
Judge
1212-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Bhujabali S/o Bhimappa Alagur
Adv. H.R.P
Respondent(s)
S. L. A. O. Hipparagi Dam project
Assistant Engineer Hipparagi Project hipparagi
D.C. State government Bagalkot
Hearing History
Judge: 1212-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Compliance
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
Amended Plaint
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-11-2025 | Amended Plaint |
| 26-09-2025 | OBJECTION |
Interim Orders
This court order from a Kannada court (dated 16-09-2017) in case no. 09/2016 addresses a property dispute concerning a house. The court heard arguments from both the petitioner and respondent regarding ownership and maintenance of the property, with the respondent claiming government responsibility for repairs and construction costs. The order notes that two photographs and one document were submitted as evidence (marked as Exhibits 2, 3, and 4) and directs that the matter proceed according to applicable law; no further hearing date is mentioned, suggesting the case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This court order from a Kannada court (dated 16-09-2017) in case no. 09/2016 addresses a property dispute concerning a house. The court heard arguments from both the petitioner and respondent regarding ownership and maintenance of the property, with the respondent claiming government responsibility for repairs and construction costs. The order notes that two photographs and one document were submitted as evidence (marked as Exhibits 2, 3, and 4) and directs that the matter proceed according to applicable law; no further hearing date is mentioned, suggesting the case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts