Labour Inspector, Hungund Circle, Hungund vs Sri. Suryakant S/o Shankarappa Jakanapalli — 1261/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/s.223(1). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KABK310023002025
Filing Number
1261/2025
Filing Date
18-Aug-2025
Registration No
1261/2025
Registration Date
18-Aug-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNGUND
Judge
116-Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Labour Inspector, Hungund Circle, Hungund
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sri. Suryakant S/o Shankarappa Jakanapalli
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The National Lok Adalat convicted the accused of violating Sections 4(1) and (3) and Rule 3 of the Karnataka Shop and Commercial Establishment Act-1961, after the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty. Considering the accused's status as the sole earning member of the family and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 1,000 fine, with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
06-Mar-2026
A.D.R.
Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
11-Dec-2025
Summons
Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
05-Dec-2025
Summons
Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
04-Nov-2025
Summons
Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
12-Sep-2025
Summons
Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
06-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1261/2025
The National Lok Adalat convicted the accused of violating Sections 4(1) and (3) and Rule 3 of the Karnataka Shop and Commercial Establishment Act-1961, after the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty. Considering the accused's status as the sole earning member of the family and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 1,000 fine, with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts