Labour Inspector, Hungund Circle, Hungund vs Sri. Suryakant S/o Shankarappa Jakanapalli — 1261/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/s.223(1). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABK310023002025

Case disposedSub Stage

Filing Number

1261/2025

Filing Date

18-08-2025

Registration No

1261/2025

Registration Date

18-08-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNGUND

Judge

116-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/s.223(1)
Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishment Act Section U/s.4(1),and(3),Rule3,and,U/s.29,Rule24(11)

Petitioner(s)

Labour Inspector, Hungund Circle, Hungund

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sri. Suryakant S/o Shankarappa Jakanapalli

Hearing History

Judge: 116-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND

14-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

A.D.R.

11-12-2025

SUMMONS

05-12-2025

SUMMONS

04-11-2025

SUMMONS

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

The National Lok Adalat convicted the accused of violating Sections 4(1) and (3) and Rule 3 of the Karnataka Shop and Commercial Establishment Act-1961, after the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty. Considering the accused's status as the sole earning member of the family and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 1,000 fine, with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The National Lok Adalat convicted the accused of violating Sections 4(1) and (3) and Rule 3 of the Karnataka Shop and Commercial Establishment Act-1961, after the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty. Considering the accused's status as the sole earning member of the family and mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 1,000 fine, with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNGUND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case