The State by Shrishai K Byakod PSI vs Ramappa Yamanappa Divanad Advocate - B N MAJJAGI — 1297/2018
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 379,353R/w34IPC. Status: EVIDENCES. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KABK310022862018
Next Hearing
30th May 2026
Filing Number
1297/2018
Filing Date
24-11-2018
Registration No
1297/2018
Registration Date
24-11-2018
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNGUND
Judge
116-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State by Shrishai K Byakod PSI
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ramappa Yamanappa Divanad Advocate - B N MAJJAGI
Niranjan S/o Shivaputrappa Tuganshi alias Goravar
Manjappa S/o Bhimappa Pujari
Huchhappa S/o Jalappa Baradelli
Hearing History
Judge: 116-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
EVIDENCES
Objection
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | EVIDENCES |
| 11-03-2026 | Objection |
| 06-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 21-02-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCES |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This is a criminal case (Case No. 1297/2018) heard before the Principal Civil Judge at Hunsur court on 30-01-2026. The witness (a Police Inspector, aged 48) provided testimony regarding the investigation conducted between 08-05-2015 and 06-09-2018, detailing evidence collection, accused identification, and police procedures. The defense counsel (representing accused 1-4) cross-examined the witness, raising questions about evidence authenticity and investigative procedures. The witness's testimony was recorded and various exhibits were identified and marked as evidence (NIP-1 through NIP-17). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This is a criminal case (Case No. 1297/2018) heard before the Principal Civil Judge at Hunsur court on 30-01-2026. The witness (a Police Inspector, aged 48) provided testimony regarding the investigation conducted between 08-05-2015 and 06-09-2018, detailing evidence collection, accused identification, and police procedures. The defense counsel (representing accused 1-4) cross-examined the witness, raising questions about evidence authenticity and investigative procedures. The witness's testimony was recorded and various exhibits were identified and marked as evidence (NIP-1 through NIP-17). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts