Smt. Deepa W/o Basappa Sulibhavi Urf Ambiger vs Basappa S/o Yallappa Sulibhavi Advocate - SANGAPPA SHIVALINGAPPA TARIWAL — 420/2020
Case under U Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc. Status: EVIDENCES. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK310020752020
Next Hearing
28th March 2026
Filing Number
420/2020
Filing Date
22-12-2020
Registration No
420/2020
Registration Date
22-12-2020
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNGUND
Judge
870-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Deepa W/o Basappa Sulibhavi Urf Ambiger
Adv. SANGAPPA SHIVALINGAPPA TARIWAL
Kumari Dhanushri D/o Basappa Sulibhavi Urf Ambiger M/g mother of Plaintiff No 1
Kumar Yallappa Urf Yalluraj S/o Basappa Sulibhavi Urf Ambiger M/g mother of petitioner No1
Respondent(s)
Basappa S/o Yallappa Sulibhavi Advocate - SANGAPPA SHIVALINGAPPA TARIWAL
Hearing History
Judge: 870-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
EVIDENCES
EVIDENCES
Await Report
Await Report
EVIDENCES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCES |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCES |
| 07-11-2025 | Await Report |
| 04-09-2025 | Await Report |
| 24-07-2025 | EVIDENCES |
Interim Orders
In OS No. 420/2020 dated 29-08-2024, the court ordered the submission of three documents as evidence: (1) Government Resolution No. 9 regarding the matter, marked as Exhibit 1; (2) Government Resolution No. 11-A, marked as Exhibit 2; and (3) a certified copy of the 2004-05 annual report from the Gram Panchayat, marked as Exhibit 3. The oral arguments of both parties' advocates were heard and noted, and the case appears to be pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In OS No. 420/2020 dated 29-08-2024, the court ordered the submission of three documents as evidence: (1) Government Resolution No. 9 regarding the matter, marked as Exhibit 1; (2) Government Resolution No. 11-A, marked as Exhibit 2; and (3) a certified copy of the 2004-05 annual report from the Gram Panchayat, marked as Exhibit 3. The oral arguments of both parties' advocates were heard and noted, and the case appears to be pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts