The State by Aminagad PS vs Tippanna Shivasangappa Konnur Advocate - NABISAB LALSAB TAHASHILDAR — 1071/2021
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 279,337,338,304(A)IPC,3,181,146,196MVAct. Status: EVIDENCES. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KABK310019542021
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
1071/2021
Filing Date
13-09-2021
Registration No
1071/2021
Registration Date
13-09-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNGUND
Judge
870-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State by Aminagad PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Tippanna Shivasangappa Konnur Advocate - NABISAB LALSAB TAHASHILDAR
Buranasab Razaqasab Ibbalagi
Hearing History
Judge: 870-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
EVIDENCES
EVIDENCES
EVIDENCES
EVIDENCES
EVIDENCES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCES |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCES |
| 06-12-2025 | EVIDENCES |
| 17-10-2025 | EVIDENCES |
| 22-08-2025 | EVIDENCES |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition (CRO 1071/2021) filed under Section 251 CrPC is allowed. The court set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner, finding that the charges under IPC Sections 279, 338, 304(a), and others were not substantiated by sufficient evidence. The case is remitted for reconsideration by the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition (CRO 1071/2021) filed under Section 251 CrPC is allowed. The court set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner, finding that the charges under IPC Sections 279, 338, 304(a), and others were not substantiated by sufficient evidence. The case is remitted for reconsideration by the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts